By Sarah Lin, Library Systems Librarian at Reed Smith LLP
If you attended SLA’s recent Lawmaggedon webinar, you may have heard Jean O’Grady reference the term ‘anecdata’ — usage data based on the anecdotal, in the absence of any hard (or soft) usage data. I have seen the anecdotal trump data over the years: most notably a strong protest against a cancellation, only to find a thick layer of dust in front of the item in question.
Of course, our print collection continues to decline and so many technical services tasks now revolve around digital materials, but the physical books are still here. When faced with competing budget priorities, how do you know what you can really cut? I’d like to offer a few suggestions to discover real data regarding print usage.
by: Steven A. Lastres, Director of Library & KM, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP and Scott Bailey, Director of Research Services, Squire Sanders
A group of librarians from The Private Law Librarians Special Interest Section (PLL SIS) of the American Association of Law Libraries (AALL) and The Law Librarians’ Society of Washington, D.C. (LLSDC) have been brainstorming ways to promote the value of law librarians. The idea is to demonstrate to lawyers, the “C” level and other professionals that work in law firms not just the traditional value to the practice of law, but to show how law librarians can be strategic allies in supporting the business of law. Continue reading →
By Robert S. Stivers, Manager of Information Services Harter Secrest & Emery LLP
I recently circulated a query to the Private Law Libaries Special Interest Section (PLL-SIS) of the American Association of Law Libraries (AALL) listserve asking whether anyone had experience with a particular consulting firm and its offer to evaluate the firm’s online services contracts, and negotiate future contracts with LexisNexis and Westlaw.
I received approximately twenty responses which, as these things go, seemed like a reasonable amount of interest in the topic. The responses provided some excellent information about the consulting firm and others who provide the same type of services. The information was instructive, occasionally opinionated and included examples of both the positive and the less than positive experiences of my colleagues. Continue reading →